<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Porticus 1.6.3 Released</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alittledrop.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=34" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34</link>
	<description>Random jottings in  Cocoa world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 23:53:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-263</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 08:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-263</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t know it needed to run under an admin account, I&#039;ll have a look.

Thanks
Richard</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t know it needed to run under an admin account, I&#8217;ll have a look.</p>
<p>Thanks<br />
Richard</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global667</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-262</link>
		<dc:creator>global667</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 18:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-262</guid>
		<description>Hello,

its a little pity that the the gui need to run under an admin account. It will be comfortable to run porticus successfully under an useraccount (with double-entering the admin pw indeed).

Greets</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello,</p>
<p>its a little pity that the the gui need to run under an admin account. It will be comfortable to run porticus successfully under an useraccount (with double-entering the admin pw indeed).</p>
<p>Greets</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Beck</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>David Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 22:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-261</guid>
		<description>I second the desire for open source. I would like to contribute and try to  make Porticus a better program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I second the desire for open source. I would like to contribute and try to  make Porticus a better program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-260</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-260</guid>
		<description>Thanks Jim, useful comments and I will look at updating for the next build.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Jim, useful comments and I will look at updating for the next build.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Busser</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Busser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-259</guid>
		<description>Hi... I am making some notes about installing and configuring Porticus that may be useful to contribute back at intervals.

1. Does the Preference &quot;At startup&quot; mean &quot;of the System&quot; or &quot;of Porticus&quot;? Since this is ambiguous, can I argue for the extra words?

2. The Preference &quot;At startup&quot; option &quot;Update everything&quot; is evidently -d selfupdate and there exists after all in Porticus a menu &quot;Self Update&quot;. Therefore would you consider to rename &quot;Update everything&quot; to &quot;Do MacPorts selfupdate&quot;

3. When Porticus issues a selfupdate, may it as well obey its own Global command flag preference for &quot;debug&quot; as to whether or not to issue the -d flag when running selfupdate?

4. Presently if one runs Ports &gt; Update All (at least, when no smart-folders display any Outdated ports) the user is advised

   Error: No ports found

The meaning is not apparent. Can Porticus ascertain (intercept) states where there is no point to run the menu item, and provide the user a different message, maybe &quot;No ports appear Outdated.&quot;

Does the menu item in essence mean &quot;Update All Outdated&quot; regardless of whether or not they are selected and – if that is the case – might this renaming be helpful?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi&#8230; I am making some notes about installing and configuring Porticus that may be useful to contribute back at intervals.</p>
<p>1. Does the Preference &#8220;At startup&#8221; mean &#8220;of the System&#8221; or &#8220;of Porticus&#8221;? Since this is ambiguous, can I argue for the extra words?</p>
<p>2. The Preference &#8220;At startup&#8221; option &#8220;Update everything&#8221; is evidently -d selfupdate and there exists after all in Porticus a menu &#8220;Self Update&#8221;. Therefore would you consider to rename &#8220;Update everything&#8221; to &#8220;Do MacPorts selfupdate&#8221;</p>
<p>3. When Porticus issues a selfupdate, may it as well obey its own Global command flag preference for &#8220;debug&#8221; as to whether or not to issue the -d flag when running selfupdate?</p>
<p>4. Presently if one runs Ports &gt; Update All (at least, when no smart-folders display any Outdated ports) the user is advised</p>
<p>   Error: No ports found</p>
<p>The meaning is not apparent. Can Porticus ascertain (intercept) states where there is no point to run the menu item, and provide the user a different message, maybe &#8220;No ports appear Outdated.&#8221;</p>
<p>Does the menu item in essence mean &#8220;Update All Outdated&#8221; regardless of whether or not they are selected and – if that is the case – might this renaming be helpful?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-258</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-258</guid>
		<description>Glad to hear it, I know of one potential issue with changes to the upgrade options (-f replaced with --enforce-variants and --force) which will be addressed in the next release - hopefully fairly soon!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to hear it, I know of one potential issue with changes to the upgrade options (-f replaced with &#8211;enforce-variants and &#8211;force) which will be addressed in the next release &#8211; hopefully fairly soon!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toni</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-257</link>
		<dc:creator>Toni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-257</guid>
		<description>Just tested Porticus 1.6.3 in Snow Leopard with MacPorts 1.8.0 and it works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just tested Porticus 1.6.3 in Snow Leopard with MacPorts 1.8.0 and it works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-256</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 15:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-256</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m using Porticus for quite some time and really appreciate the effort you put into it!
Is there a way to lower the priority with which the port command is run? I can do it by looking for the pids and using renice, but it would be nice (no pun intended) to have a preference setting for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m using Porticus for quite some time and really appreciate the effort you put into it!<br />
Is there a way to lower the priority with which the port command is run? I can do it by looking for the pids and using renice, but it would be nice (no pun intended) to have a preference setting for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 19:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-254</guid>
		<description>Glad you like it. I have considered making it open source and it may happen in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad you like it. I have considered making it open source and it may happen in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dago</title>
		<link>http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34&#038;cpage=1#comment-253</link>
		<dc:creator>Dago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 18:03:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alittledrop.com/blog/?p=34#comment-253</guid>
		<description>I have just discovered Porticus after reading the recent article on ADC: really good job!

Have you ever considered to open source it?

Every six months, or so, someone in the Darwin community  have tried in the past to make a new GUI for MacPorts but none was snappy enough for a daily use, seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have just discovered Porticus after reading the recent article on ADC: really good job!</p>
<p>Have you ever considered to open source it?</p>
<p>Every six months, or so, someone in the Darwin community  have tried in the past to make a new GUI for MacPorts but none was snappy enough for a daily use, seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
